*my childhood nickname
“He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster” Nietzsche
Fiction on Long Street and the Rhino pub in Tarkastad have little in common. Fiction at first appears genuinely alternative, but a second glance confirms its place in the ideological mainstream. It simmers with Cape Town’s homogenous, post-punk trendoids, who place the city’s ‘underground’ scene firmly at ground level. Fiction’s women’s day posters of tomb-raideresque, bikini girls, illustrate its support of the general status quo.
By contrast, the Rhino pub of Tarkastad (between Queenstown and Cradock) opts for art-deco retro fascism: its pub theme not being Irish cosiness or sporting heroism, but Apartheid. Pictures of pin-up boys Paul Kruger and Hendrik Verwoerd line the walls, poets can enjoy the flowing libretto of ‘Die Stem’ displayed behind the bar, while those with a keen eye for aesthetic panache can scan the ceiling’s South African Sistine 5m X 5m Vierkleur old South African flag.
For me, these contrasting watering holes are connected due to consecutive week ends in August, when I succeeded, at 27 years of age, in making my fisticuffs debut at these two venues. First, with Ronald Suresh Roberts at Fiction and then with Willie Liebenberg, owner of the Rhino.
I (Addy), confronted Monsieur Roberts (Ronny), telling him that his ‘native intelligence of Thabo Mbeki’ and support for the dismissal of the Deputy minister of health offended my left leaning sensibilities. He unexpectedly punched me, I rugby tackled him. I was escorted from Fiction. Monsieur Liebenberg (Willie), initially suspicious when myself and 5 friends entered the Rhino, then conceded that he would add Mandela to his wall of pinups if we donated the portrait. But when Addy in drunken bravado, tore down 1 of the 5 or so old South African flags, Willie went to retrieve his baseball bat, from when, I assume, the Tarkastad Tornados had major league status. I survived, this is the tale.
I had hoped this piece (an attempt to resolve my little quarter life duelling crisis) would unpack the ‘who exists for whom’ in the uncanny smorgasbord that is South African multi-culturalism: Is Ronny the product of Willie’s racism? Are Willie and his bar the result of Afrikaner alienation due to Addy and Ronny’s self-righteousness? Is Addy the middle-class, DSTV watching pseudo-Lefty, authenticated by Willie’s conservativism and Ronny’s new black elitism?
Let’s rather twist the Rubik’s to expose one of its shadowed facades. Addy and Ronny and Willie represent certain forms of brittle South African masculinities whose honour is uncertain and shame easily aggravated. Cross-cultural masculinity’s most common characteristic is honour or respect, something which is never attained and is always contested and desired. To add to this notion of honour, violent exchanges almost always involve the threat of shame. These issues of honour and shame are pertinent in the South African context. Afrikaners are too easily branded the only villains of Apartheid. Black intellectuals supporting Mbeki are often called sycophants and elitists, while white middle-class lefties are left tenuously disorientated in a world of multi-national capitalism and affirmative action.
This elusive ‘honour’ and lurking shame produces defensiveness and paradox amongst men in general and South African men in particular: the more they assert themselves the more they call themselves into question. Addy and Ronny and Willie attempt to claim recognition and legitimacy through the different masculine South African narratives they contrastingly position themselves within. But these narratives are tentative because of the history of this country and the way it has divided groups of people and because the future seems hazy. Threatening these uncertain masculinities can easily lead to conflict and violence when honour is at stake.
But the coliseums for settling these disputes should not be Fiction or the Rhino and the means of engagement should not be fisticuffs. Despite our high Gini co-efficient, ethnic heterogeneity, colonial history, lax alcohol laws, prison system and rates of single parenthood, South Africa still has higher rates of crime and violence than countries with similar structural conditions. Perhaps this is because we have certain forms of socially learned, volatile and uncertain masculinities, produced by our collective history and the way it has divided groups of people. These forms of being men negate dialogue and compromise in political circles, social settings, schools and homes. Social change does not come about through mindless violence. It requires a combination of brave action and intelligent consciousness expanding. It also requires reflection, asking questions and the ability to be self-critical. If Addy and Ronny and Willie want to become heroes, they need to learn to listen, think before they act, breathe deeply, accept criticism and reinvent forms of South African masculinities that serve as peaceful and empathetic role-models for the next generation of South African men.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
This is not to say much, or nothing of any real importance. In fact, I wouldn’t have thought to say anything at all…except, this is a really good piece and I figured I’d mar it with a thought or two of my own…if only for the pleasure of spite.
Of course you right, and between “elusive “honour’ and lurking shame” is the mark of a fragile, tortured masculinity – forever surrounded by power without ever being able to ‘recognise’ himself in it…what those ever-allegorical pomo folk might characterise as the traumatic gap that separates the penis and the phallus.
But, on the other hand, William Munny was a ‘marder’!
It would have been sufficient to leave it there had the movie ‘Unforgiven’ been given the attention it deserved. But alas, nobody looks to westerns for the answers to riddles of masculinity, let alone for the tactical positions of an antagonistic politics. William Munny was a bad man, for sure…and he’d sooner kill you than piss on a hot rock. ‘Pure meaness’. But he wasn’t ‘like that no more’.
Redemption however only carries the bitter taste of the symbolic order… the ever-present threat of ‘lurking shame’. And more so for Willaim Munny, who had killed ‘women and children’ and ‘just about everything that walks or crawled’…William Munny who never had a problem ‘when it came to killing’, and who wielded the sovereign decision with all the confidence of someone standing outside the law…shame proportionate to the distance of the fall.
Isn’t this precisely the ambiguity of his declaration of ‘having changed’ in one of the opening sequences of the film:
Ned Logan: You were crazy, Will.
Will Munny: Yeah, no one liked me. Mountain boys all thought I was gonna shoot 'em out of pure meanness.
Ned Logan: Well, like I said, you ain't like that no more.
Will Munny: That's right. I'm just a fella now. I ain't no different than anyone else no more.
(my emphasis)
This ‘lurking shame’, so beautifully arrested in Munny’s addition of ‘no more’ in his assertion of being ‘no different than anyone else’, follows him throughout the movie; from the opening scene of him chasing the pig, to the beating he receives at the hands of the sheriff and his men. But after they kill Ned, Munny shifts beyond “elusive honour and lurking shame’ to become a ‘pure force of antagonism’. Not the shadowy double of (sovereign) public power that had been his former (bad) self (as most people who watch the movie assume), but the expression of a destructive violence whose only purpose for being is the annihilation of power (embodied in the sheriff, Little Bill Daggett). This is why, when Bill Daggett presents Munny with the name, with all its weight within the symbolic order, Munny can remain indifferent and no longer needs to make reference to his redemption. His is now just the simple assertion purpose:
Little Bill Daggett: You'd be William Munny out of Missouri. Killer of women and children.
Will Munny: That's right. I've killed women and children. I've killed just about everything that walks or crawled at one time or another. And I'm here to kill you, Little Bill, for what you did to Ned.
But to get back to the point…and there was a point…one of the most memorable bits of the movie is the scene where Munny walks into the bar, passes Ned’s body set on display, and confronts the man gathered round Bill Daggett. As if enveloped in ‘marderdom’ and the quintessence of cool, Munny poses a question:
Will Munny: Who's the fellow owns this shithole?
[pause]
Will Munny: You, fat man. Speak up.
Skinny Dubois: Uh, I... I own this establishment. I bought the place from Greeley for a thousand dollars.
[Will levels the shotgun, and speaks to someone standing behind Skinny]
Will Munny: You better clear outta there.
Man: Yes, sir.
[scampers out of the way]
Little Bill Daggett: Just hold it right there. Hold it...!
[Will shoots Skinny. Screaming, the women scatter upstairs]
Little Bill Daggett: Well, sir, you are a cowardly son of a bitch! You just shot an unarmed man!
Will Munny: Well, he should have armed himself if he's going to decorate his saloon with my friend.
So here’s the thing, being an aids denialist is not some same as killing your best friend, and decorating a bar with symbols of a defeated supremacist project is not the same as decorating it with your best friends body. On the other hand, the guy is Ronald Suresh and symbol is the South African flag…so, I’m not white, but I am probably a middle class lefty, but I’m with Munny on this one…you had better arm yourself. The point, I think, is that sometimes you got to be the phallus even at the risk of being a dick. So the next time I’m in Cape Town, if you buy the whiskey - in spite of my pretenses to being a reclusive-kipgooier-intellectual - we can go find some fascists and denailists to get into it with.
so i hope you don't mind i posted my response on my blog with a link here. this is what you get for adding me to your blogroll
of course you know i'm not really serious...well not unless you really gonna buy the whiskey...
This one time, Nietzsche told me, "Fisticuffs solves the hitherto irksome task of meat preparation - in that tenderising happens naturally and before death."
We're going to eat Ronnie, right?
Post a Comment